
Is art revisiting the Warhol era? Have we successfully combined the fine arts in an attempt to popularize it through our choice of venue? What does it mean to display art along side a bikini shoot? Do people think much of the art which accompanies their dinner?
My argument in this matter is that the artist world is changing. No longer is it necessary to make your way down to Queen West in order to experience spectacles of visual artism. Instead art is spreading itself into more public spaces. From prestigious elitism (museum), to institution (AGO), to what I consider a ‘ready wall’: wherever there is wall space, and an attractive social function, there is a gallery. This transformation of the gallery space includes with it different implications. With this change, the liability of the cause of art begins to erupt or maybe better put, to erode.
When art becomes an accommodation to a meal, or a back drop to an event one has to take responsibility in becoming aware that an artist’s message has just taken its first steps in hindering. However, at the same time it is being popularized, publicized and noticed, and then hopefully someone might take the time to ask: “what is this about?”.
Regardless, the effort is a positive one; to beautify an area, to accelerate the career of an emerging artist, and to expose cultural significance amongst a public that may not have noticed it before.
Contributing Writer: Hanna Kunysz